$y=bˣ / SOL
volume 24h
price
mcap

token-2022 · solana · program-claimed fee stream

y=bx

the exponential curve

a programmatically enforced curve that only goes up.

an on-chain program claims the fee stream from every trade and splits it in two: half bids for the token on the open market and burns what it fills, half backs a reserve any holder can redeem against.

Your claim(balance ÷ supply) × reserve
your balance
your share
claimable
connect to read your balance and what it claims

the floor against the order flow that produces it, hourly. the upper curve is the reserve leg of the fee stream divided by circulating supply, accumulated across every bar of real traded volume. below the baseline, flow is split by direction — buy-dominant bars above, sell-dominant below. figures the program alone can report, once it is live, read as loading rather than as a number.

abstract

$y=bˣ is a Token-2022 mint whose creator-fee stream is claimed by a program rather than by a wallet. Each claim is split in a ratio fixed at deployment: 50.00% is spent bidding for the token on the open market and burning what it fills, and 50.00% is retained in a reserve account that collateralizes redemption. The allocation is not discretionary and there is no path by which either half reaches an individual.

What this produces is a floor: the reserve balance divided by circulating supply, denominated in SOL, computable from two account balances and nothing else. It does not depend on the price of the token, on continued inflows, or on anyone's intent. It is an accounting identity over state that already exists on chain.

fee claim and allocation

Trading against the curve accrues creator revenue in SOL. The program claims it and routes it, in the same transaction, into two accounts. Neither leg is a transfer to a person, and the split is not a parameter anyone adjusts after the fact.

Allocation of a claim c
  bid_leg     = c · 0.50
  reserve_leg = c · 0.50

  R  ← R + reserve_leg
  B  ← B + bid_leg
R = redemption reserve · B = undeployed bid allocation. The bid leg is held until the market satisfies the condition below; it is not spent on arrival.

Tokens minted against the curve are distributed across holders in proportion to balance. It is worth being precise about what that does: since every balance scales by the same factor, no holder's share of supply changes, and therefore no holder's claim on the reserve changes. Issuance is a distribution mechanism. The backing comes from the reserve leg, and the per-token improvement comes from retirement.

the floor

A holder of h tokens against a supply of S owns h/S of the reserve. Redemption pays that claim in SOL and retires the tokens presented.

Floor
floor = R / S

claim(h) = (h / S) · R
R = reserve lamports · S = circulating supply · h = tokens held. Quoted in SOL throughout, never in dollars.

redemption is not dilutive

The standard objection to a redeemable claim is that early exits are paid out of the people who stay. Here they are not. Burning k tokens pays k·R/S and removes k from supply; numerator and denominator contract in the same proportion, so the floor is invariant under redemption.

Floor-neutrality of redemption
redeem k:

  R' = R − kR/S
  S' = S − k

  R'/S' = (R − kR/S) / (S − k)
        = R(S − k)/S / (S − k)
        = R/S
Exiting is neutral for everyone who stays.

An exit fee moves it from invariant to strictly increasing. With f = 3.00% withheld, the redeemer receives (1−f)·k·R/S and the remainder stays in a reserve now divided by a smaller supply.

Floor-increase with exit fee f
redeem k, withhold f:

  R' = R − (1−f)·kR/S
  S' = S − k

  R'/S' = (R/S) · (1 + f·k/(S − k))

  1 + f·k/(S − k) > 1     for 0 < f ≤ 1, 0 < k < S
The multiplier exceeds one for any non-zero fee, so the floor is non-decreasing under redemption.

when the bid may run

The bid leg spends reserve-adjacent capital into the market, which means it can destroy value as easily as create it. Spending ΔR at price P retires ΔR/P tokens, and the sign of the effect on the floor is determined entirely by where P sits relative to the floor itself.

Buyback condition
spend ΔR at price P, burn ΔR/P tokens:

  floor' = (R − ΔR) / (S − ΔR/P)

  floor' > floor   ⟺   P < R/S

with u = ΔR/R and m = floor/P:

  floor'/floor = (1 − u) / (1 − u·m)
Accretive strictly below the floor, neutral at it, dilutive above it. Buying back above the floor pays more per token than the token is backed by — which is why most buyback-and-burn schemes leak value.

Enforced as a precondition rather than left to judgement, this makes the allocation a standing bid underneath the market: while price trades below the SOL backing each token, the program is a buyer and every fill raises the floor for everyone still holding. Above the floor it does nothing, and the allocation simply accumulates.

the reserve

Reserve
Reserve balance
Reserve leg of the fee split, less redemptions paid
SOL
Floor value
R ÷ S
SOL
Circulating supply
y=bˣ
Total burned
Bought by the bid, plus tokens presented for redemption
y=bˣ
Minted against the curve
Distributed pro-rata; leaves every holder's share unchanged
y=bˣ
Exit fee
Withheld on redemption, retained by the reserve
3.00%
Fee claim
Accrued to date
SOL
Allocated to the bid
50.00% of every claim
SOL
Deployed
Fills taken below the floor
SOL
Undeployed
Waiting on the market to trade under the backing
SOL
Accounts
Mint
Program PDA